<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Proxmark developers community]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/feed/atom/"/>
	<updated>2010-03-10T22:32:49Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Contents of a legic card]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/519/contents-of-a-legic-card/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>I read the contents of a legic card (has 2 segments).<br />I have some questions regarding there segments:<br />- I think 2 segments = 2 card applications, right?<br />- contain the segments any further structure or are they plain playload data (e.g. like file contents)<br />- has the content any relation to legic (or any other standard) or is the manfucturer free to write what he wants in the payload (use his own &quot;standard&quot;)?</p><p>Thanks in advance ...</p><br /><p>Best regards from Germany</p><p>BKone</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[BKone]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1209/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T22:32:49Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/519/contents-of-a-legic-card/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Was decoding wonderfully, but now isn't?? (Windows binary Winter 2010)]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/516/was-decoding-wonderfully-but-now-isnt-windows-binary-winter-2010/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I am using the windows binary package Winter 2010, all the firmware flashed to those versions, and the client from that too.&nbsp; I was able to decode a 125KHz card that is just like in this article:<br /><a href="http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki/TagOps">http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki/TagOps</a><br />And all the traces looked the same as in the article, and I was able to correlate the number on the card with the stuff I decoded - woot!</p><p>However, I then decided to further explore the commands available in the Help system, to see what they all did.&nbsp; At some point the traces STOPPED looking like the article...&nbsp; So I did a device reset, and still, the same commands with the same card no longer produce any meaningful output!&nbsp; I still get a significant tune voltage drop when the card is on the antenna, but the data plot output is not all nice like it used to be.&nbsp; Sadly I didn&#039;t save the trace when it was nice, but it really looked exactly like this, from that tutorial:<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://proxmark3.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/symbol-1.png" alt="Good looking trace" /></span></p><p>Now here&#039;s what it looks like, it varies between these two patterns.&nbsp; I&#039;ve included trace files:<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://imgur.com/HYP3w.jpg" alt="http://imgur.com/HYP3w.jpg" /></span><br /><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/file/yezng25tjzy/%20badtrace">http://www.mediafire.com/file/yezng25tjzy/%20badtrace</a> Trace file 1</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://imgur.com/ywAvi.jpg" alt="http://imgur.com/ywAvi.jpg" /></span><br /><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/file/mit3j42ykjw/%20badtrace2">http://www.mediafire.com/file/mit3j42ykjw/%20badtrace2</a> Trace file 2</p><p>Any suggestions on getting that nice mode back?<br />Thank you<br />CSM</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[CardSaysMoops]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1494/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T15:56:08Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/516/was-decoding-wonderfully-but-now-isnt-windows-binary-winter-2010/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Winter '10 - test release]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/506/winter-10-test-release/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I just uploaded a binary beta release<br /><a href="http://proxmark3.googlecode.com/files/proxmark3_win_bins_beta.zip">http://proxmark3.googlecode.com/files/p &#133; s_beta.zip</a></p><p>if you guys (well, people with some knowledge, because there are no documentation yet) could give it a try, if possible from a pristine windows (so I know whether or not I forgot some DLLs), that&#039;d be great.</p><p>to flash the proxmark with it, just use:<br />flasher.exe ..\arm\fullimage.elf<br />from the bin directory.</p><p>Let me know how it goes...</p><p>(on a pristine windows computer, you&#039;ll *first* have to install the proxmark driver I included, since it will install the libusb0 DLL. The installation procedure *will* be documented of course...)</p><p>Edit: A bootrom is included. If someone (with JTAG ^^) can test it as well...</p><p>Edit2: I have updated the link to the beta version <img src="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Cex]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1232/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T07:04:29Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/506/winter-10-test-release/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Ordered 125K kits from qKits]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/518/ordered-125k-kits-from-qkits/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I didnt really feel like running tune 47 times to get a perfect antenna. I ordered two AN0201 and AN0301 types, ill test them out and let you guys know.</p><p><a href="http://store.qkits.com/moreinfo.cfm/AN0201">http://store.qkits.com/moreinfo.cfm/AN0201</a></p><p><a href="http://store.qkits.com/moreinfo.cfm/AN0301">http://store.qkits.com/moreinfo.cfm/AN0301</a></p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[terrizzi]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1487/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T03:49:44Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/518/ordered-125k-kits-from-qkits/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[ripped antenna from HID reader]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/517/ripped-antenna-from-hid-reader/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>thought it could just hook it up since HID makes readers, but my vaules are all screwy.</p><p># LF antenna:&nbsp; 6.18 V @&nbsp; &nbsp;125.00 kHz<br /># LF antenna:&nbsp; 6.31 V @&nbsp; &nbsp;134.00 kHz<br /># LF optimal: 40.82 V @&nbsp; &nbsp;203.39 kHz<br /># HF antenna:&nbsp; 0.10 V @&nbsp; &nbsp; 13.56 MHz<br /># Your HF antenna is unusable.</p><p>any ideas,&nbsp; remove some coils?</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[d18c7db]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1487/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T03:46:34Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/517/ripped-antenna-from-hid-reader/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[HID iClass.  Anyone have experience?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/514/hid-iclass-anyone-have-experience/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m fascinated by the HID iClass cards.&nbsp; The technology seems very MIFARE-like.&nbsp; The only way to deal with them that I&#039;ve found is with Omnikey readers (now HID) and their SyncAPI (Windows/Linux).&nbsp; It&#039;s not very open.</p><p>Has anyone done anything with these cards?&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen a couple dead-end threads regarding iClass on here before, but I&#039;m hoping maybe a few new people might have something to add or a latent interest</p><p>I have a stack of iClass P16K cards with the additional 125Khz Prox chips, so if you&#039;re in the US and want one or two through first-class mail, let me know.&nbsp; If you&#039;re not in the US, maybe we can trade cards.</p><p>Here&#039;s a good overview, &quot;Contactless Developer Guide - 5321-903_A.1.20&quot;:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.hidglobal.com/documents/ok_contactless_developer_guide_an_en.pdf">http://www.hidglobal.com/documents/ok_c &#133; _an_en.pdf</a></p><p>I have links to other docs, but none are as useful as that one.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wrc]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/369/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-10T01:30:25Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/514/hid-iclass-anyone-have-experience/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[if selfbuild: what's the smallest size possible?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/513/if-selfbuild-whats-the-smallest-size-possible/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>hello :-)</p><p>I&#039;m interest in a really really small rfid-reader - so my question is:<br />what&#039;s the smallest size possible if one would build an own?</p><p>i saw these: <a href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/264/my-portable-proxmark3-setup/">http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/264 &#133; rk3-setup/</a><br />they are really nice! but what&#039;s the smallest size possible?</p><p>thanks in advance for your help!<br />oliver</p><p>@marauder <br />thanks - I edited my post :-)</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wbahn]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1489/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-09T03:27:17Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/513/if-selfbuild-whats-the-smallest-size-possible/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[My set of antennas]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/90/my-set-of-antennas/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>OK I&#039;m getting real excited now, the prox is built and it was high time I tested it, but for that I needed some antennas.</p><p>At first I used a piece of wirewrap &quot;green wire&quot; and rolled a 5 turn aircoil 43mm diameter, then experimentally played around with adding or removing a turn while issuing the tune command to get a voltage reading. It mostly sat around 1.3V except when I let the coil turns lose and unravelled and the coil looked like a deformed spring the voltage jumped to over 10V but that was not really an option for an antenna. I then returned to the 43mm diameter coil with 4 turns and taped the coil with sellotape to keep it together then started deforming it to see what difference that made. It looks like I got lucky as squashing it to an elongated and slighlty rectangular shape moved the voltage to about 16V.</p><p>This is how I ended up with this shape. It used to be straighter but the coil has been through a lot. It&#039;s soldered direct to the test pads as somebody forgot to order the mating hirose connector <img src="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/img/smilies/roll.png" width="15" height="15" alt="roll" /> when buying the parts...</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3056/3044704721_880f7309cf.jpg" alt="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3056/3044704721_880f7309cf.jpg" /></span></p><p>The picture below is a typical setup where a RFID snapper card is sandwitched between the proxmark3 antenna and a snapper feeder (card reader, the black thing that looks like a USB flash key)</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3243/3044733519_0b837bcf97.jpg" alt="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3243/3044733519_0b837bcf97.jpg" /></span></p><p>While in this close proximity, I issue the hi14asnoop command on the prox, then drive the snapper feeder with some python script for example issuing four consecutive list card commands in my python shell, like so:<br /></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_LIST_TAG)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD44A0100E100<br />recv: 0000FF14ECD54B010104002004086B64BE08578002011000092600<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_RF_OFF)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD4320100F900<br />recv: 0000FF02FED533F800<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_LIST_TAG)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD44A0100E100<br />recv: 0000FF14ECD54B01010400200408DC78E708578002011000097800<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_RF_OFF)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD4320100F900<br />recv: 0000FF02FED533F800<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_LIST_TAG)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD44A0100E100<br />recv: 0000FF14ECD54B01010400200408E743D10857800201100009B800<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_RF_OFF)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD4320100F900<br />recv: 0000FF02FED533F800<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_LIST_TAG)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD44A0100E100<br />recv: 0000FF14ECD54B0101040020040841B32908578002011000099600<br />&gt;&gt;&gt; b.snapper_send_data(PN5XX_RF_OFF)<br />sent: 0000FF04FCD4320100F900<br />recv: 0000FF02FED533F800</p></blockquote></div><p>Then stopping the snoop (press the prox button) and issuing the hi14alist command we can see what the prox snooped. Note that the card&#039;s UID changes every time, so it moves through UIDs 086B64BE, 08DC78E7, 08E743D1, 0841B329 and these UIDs in the snooped prox output match the returned values in the python debug output.<br /></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; hi14alist<br />recorded activity:<br /></p><div class="codebox"><pre><code> ETU     :rssi: who bytes
---------+----+----+-----------
 +      0:   0: TAG 04  00    
 +   1304:    :     93  20    
 +     64:   0: TAG 08  6b  64  be  b9    
 +   3471:    :     93  70  08  6b  64  be  b9  55  34    
 +     64:   0: TAG 20  fc  70    
 +   1488:    :     e0  50  bc  a5    
 +     88:   0: TAG 08  57  80  02  01  10  00  09  94  da    
 + 828164:    :     26    
 +   5142:    :     26    
 +     64:   0: TAG 04  00    
 +   1304:    :     93  20    
 +     64:   0: TAG 08  dc  78  e7  4b    
 +   3472:    :     93  70  08  dc  78  e7  4b  ac  f2    
 +     64:   0: TAG 20  fc  70    
 +   1488:    :     e0  50  bc  a5    
 +     88:   0: TAG 08  57  80  02  01  10  00  09  94  da    
 + 612070:    :     26    
 +   5142:    :     26    
 +   1368:    :     93  20    
 +     64:   0: TAG 08  e7  43  d1  7d    
 +   3472:    :     93  70  08  e7  43  d1  7d  84  67    
 +     64:   0: TAG 20  fc  70    
 +   1488:    :     e0  50  bc  a5    
 +     88:   0: TAG 08  57  80  02  01  10  00  09  94  da    
 + 578188:    :     26    
 +   5144:    :     26    
 +     64:   0: TAG 04  00    
 +   1303:    :     93  20    
 +   3536:    :     93  70  08  41  b3  29  d3  ab  fc    
 +     64:   0: TAG 20  fc  70</code></pre></div></blockquote></div><p>Finally for completeness I took Roel&#039;s idea of using a toilet paper roll, cut a slice and wound 150 turns of 0.125mm wire on it. I knew people had success in the past with around 100 turns so I started high and removed turns to get the tuning right. With 150 turns I used to get 45V on 125khz and about 20V on 136khz and as I removed turns these numbers moved closer to each other. There isn&#039;t much point going higher than 40V as the zenners will clip the voltage so I removed enough turns (lost count) until tune reported 29V at 125khz and 30V at 136khz. The picture below shows the final coil, sellotape is holding the coil to the TP roll <img src="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> and in the picture it&#039;s not actually soldered to the board as it&#039;s a little cumbersome to carry that around so I only fit it when needed. Currently I&#039;m not doing any LF work so this coil isn&#039;t needed but it has successfully read some HID tags I have (in raw data mode).</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3070/3044733465_1a60627648.jpg" alt="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3070/3044733465_1a60627648.jpg" /></span></p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[d18c7db]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/120/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-08T23:47:35Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/90/my-set-of-antennas/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New ProxSpace development environment available for download]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/495/new-proxspace-development-environment-available-for-download/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Instead of creating detailed instructions on setting up the development environment, I opted to create a new ProxSpace archive with the entire environment already set up, with both ARM and x86 compilers, see packages.txt in the root of the archive for the packages used. It&#039;s available for download from <a href="http://proxmark3.googlecode.com/files/ProxSpace-20100222-r374.7z">here</a>, use 7zip to extract it the root of C:\ then run 0setpath and 5makeall in the cockpit directory. The archive extracts to 10x the size so about 260Mb free space is needed.</p><p>If you choose to extract it to another drive/path = &lt;new_path&gt;, you <strong>must</strong> modify the paths in the files &lt;new_path&gt;\ProxSpace\pm3\cockpit\0setpath.bat and &lt;new_path&gt;\ProxSpace\msys\etc\fstab</p><p>I can&#039;t seem to use relative paths in 0setpath anymore due to &quot;make -C .. -s _test&quot; in _checkmake.bat throwing a uname not found error, if someone has any ideas, let me know.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iZsh]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/120/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-08T14:14:03Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/495/new-proxspace-development-environment-available-for-download/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Removing windows specific code]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/492/removing-windows-specific-code/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I&#039;m almost done with removing all windows specific code. Everything seems to compile and link just fine (I haven&#039;t test the QT part yet, but I wouldn&#039;t expect much issues with it).</p><p>I&#039;m using mingw/msys + pthread-win32 (2.8) + readline 5.x (from gnuwin32) + libusb-win32 and a few changes in my sandbox I&#039;d be willing to commit.</p><p>The only showstopper I&#039;m having right now is with libusb, specifically, claiming the device.</p><p>After some google-ing, it seems we need to call usb_set_configuration under windows, whereas it&#039;s not absolutely mandatory on linux and mac os. When I&#039;m calling usb_set_configuration(handle, 0), the return code is ok, but it still fails to claim the device afterwards. And when I&#039;m calling usb_set_configuration(handle, 1), this function just hangs forever...</p><p>Would it be ok if I commit the code (which basically get rid of prox.c and windows specific code and includes, and use the exact same code than mac os and linux... Hence a unique code base for the client side, which is a big step forward maintainability IMHO), with the hope that someone else will help me figuring out this libusb issue? I&#039;m running under VMWare, so I&#039;m not quite sure whether or not it could be the issue.</p><p>It compiles and links all the tools just fine (proxmark3, snooper, cli and flasher), only the proxmark device claim is failing. Once this is fixed, hopefully everything else should be just fine since it&#039;s the exact same code than mac and linux.</p><p>What do you guys think?</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iZsh]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1232/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-08T12:19:24Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/492/removing-windows-specific-code/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New to PM3, cant hi14alist]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/515/new-to-pm3-cant-hi14alist/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,<br />im new to pm3 and this community.<br />i got a pm3 with bootrom, os and fpga from svn revision 52.<br />i started trying to hi14asnoop, hi14alist a read-session between a OpenPCD and mifare classic card with default keys.<br />the openPCD software could read all data.&nbsp; But trying to hi14alist and get the sniffing results out of the pm3 always results in the same: the software on windows freezes and there is no result printed at all.</p><p>i build an antenna which serves with 10,38V on 13,25MHz.<br />i tried software and bootrom, os and fpga-images from revisions 52, 216, 412 and the latest as of now 426.</p><p>i have cross compiled them with the elf and eabi cross-compiler respectively. (arm-eabi toolchainw as taken from <a href="http://github.com/jsnyder/arm-eabi-toolchain">http://github.com/jsnyder/arm-eabi-toolchain</a>)</p><p>my intend is to sniff a whole mifare-classic sector read, but im failing at reading the information out of the pm3.</p><p>can someone of u help me? i can provide more information if needed.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[xerxesmc]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1453/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-08T12:07:46Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/515/new-to-pm3-cant-hi14alist/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[arm-eabi-gcc: Command not found]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/508/armeabigcc-command-not-found/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody,</p><p>i&#039;m trying to compile the latest svn version. I used this manual to compile the new version: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki/Compiling#Linux_Platform">http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki &#133; x_Platform</a></p><p>I&#039;m currently running Ubunty 9.10 x64. After the make command i get the following error message:</p><p>make: arm-eabi-gcc: Command not found.</p><p>I tried to find this command but it&#039;s not on my system. What did i wrong?</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ground Loop]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1390/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-07T21:58:46Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/508/armeabigcc-command-not-found/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[EM4102 tag decoding]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/414/em4102-tag-decoding/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi, recently I obtained PM3 and tried reading LF tag with EM4102. Only binary digits were printed<br />when following the instructions, which is rather inconvenient. Therefore I added some code to the winsrc/command.cpp<br />file to decode the data according to the EM4102 datasheet, checking the parity bits and printing the net result in hex.<br />Since I am new to this project, I do not know, whom/where to send patches etc. in order to contribute to the source...<br />Can you please advice me?<br />Jiri</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[toffe]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1113/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-07T01:51:03Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/414/em4102-tag-decoding/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Mifare Classic Offline Cracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/381/mifare-classic-offline-cracker/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>we have implemented and released our open source implementation of &quot;offline nested&quot; attack, tested on Mac OS X and Linux. You can try it here <a href="http://www.nethemba.com/mfoc.tar.bz2">http://www.nethemba.com/mfoc.tar.bz2</a></p><p>Feel free to provide any feedback, ideas and bug reports. Thanks.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Andy]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/812/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-06T15:54:25Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/381/mifare-classic-offline-cracker/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[noob: how often (per second) can a p3 read 20 tags?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/512/noob-how-often-per-second-can-a-p3-read-20-tags/new/posts/"/>
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>hello :-)</p><p>I&#039;m new to rfid and keep reading and asking my way deeper into this technology, so:</p><p>how often can a proxmark read 20 tags per second?</p><p>thanks in advance!<br />oliver</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[e2020]]></name>
				<uri>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/user/1489/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-05T17:45:00Z</updated>
			<id>http://www.proxmark.org/forum/topic/512/noob-how-often-per-second-can-a-p3-read-20-tags/new/posts/</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
